Loading bill breakdown…
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 31% of 25 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
100Swing
Vote on passage, Apr 29, 2025:NayProjected: 100 Swing
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT) · 3 active : 3 Republicans
Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-13.
This joint resolution allows off-road vehicles to be used in certain areas of the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, which is in northern Arizona and southeastern Utah and contains Lake Powell.
Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the
rule
issued by the National Park Service (NPS) titled
Glen Canyon National Recreation Area; Motor Vehicles
and published on January 13, 2025. Under the rule, the NPS limited the use of off-road vehicles, such as off-highway vehicles and all-terrain vehicles, in certain areas. For instance, the rule prohibited the use of off-road vehicles on an 8-mile segment of the Poison Spring Loop located on Route 633 proceeding north to Route 730 in the Orange Cliffs Special Management Unit. The rule also eliminated the authority of the NPS to open the upper portion of the Flint Trail in that unit to off-road vehicles. Additionally, the rule limited off-road vehicle use from certain roads to the shoreline of the lake.
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 36 | 2 | 6% |
| Middle | 213 | 0 | 0% |
| Entrenched | 103 | 0 | 0% |
| Insufficient data |
Members fall into . 5 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has. Where the House has voted, each member’s appears with the projection made before it.
Loading similar votes
| 64 |
| 0 |
| 0% |
| All voting members | 416 | 2 | 0% |
|---|
: Pair any member who broke with one who stayed with their party: in 99% of those pairs, the one who broke had the higher swing score before the vote. Chance would be 50%.
Projections from swing-v3, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| Middle | 75 | 0 | 0% |
| Entrenched | 12 | 0 | 0% |
| Insufficient data | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| All voting members | 91 | 0 | 0% |
Too few members broke with their party to measure .
Projections from swing-v3, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.
These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.
Ringed dots broke with their party on the vote.
Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 4 sponsor and cosponsors in the House: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched. 5 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 19.0 (needs 5.0).
