Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 3668: Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 3668119th CongressEnergy

Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act

Sponsored by Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) · 3 active : 3 Republicans

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedDec 12, 2025
Senate: next
President: not yet

8 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act

This bill expedites the environmental review of certain natural gas pipeline projects or liquefied natural gas (LNG) import or export terminals for authorizations under the Natural Gas Act.

Specifically, the bill makes the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the only lead agency for the purpose of coordinating the environmental review of such projects under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Thus, agencies involved in the environmental review process must defer to FERC's approved scope for a NEPA review.

Read full summary

FERC must invite certain federal, state, local, or tribal governmental agencies to participate in the review process for an authorization and designate the applicable governments as participating agencies by deadlines established by the bill. In addition, FERC must consult with the Transportation Security Administration regarding various pipeline security measures.

The bill prohibits FERC from establishing a deadline for authorizing a project that is more than 90 days after the completion of the NEPA review. It also requires concurrent reviews when multiple federal or state agencies are involved.

Applicants for projects do not have to obtain a water quality certification from states under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. FERC must coordinate its NEPA review with states where a potential discharge into navigable waters may occur.

If a federal or state agency requires an applicant for a pipeline authorization to submit data, the agency must consider any such data gathered by aerial or other remote means that is submitted.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On PassagePassed213 yea, 184 nayDecember 12, 2025 · Roll call 334

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	37	8	22%
Middle	277	1	0%
Entrenched	77	0	0%
Insufficient data

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Energy and Commerce · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · HouseDischarged from · Referred to
Energy · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · SenateReferred to

Subjects

Computer security and identity theft
Environmental assessment, monitoring, research
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
Government information and archives
Intergovernmental relations
Licensing and registrations
Oil and gas

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

49Swing 70–100
283Middle 30–70
98Entrenched 0–30
3Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 3 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has. Where the House has voted, each member’s appears with the projection made before it.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 69.0 (needs 5.0).

H.R. 3668 · Dec 12, 2025 · Roll call 333On PassageImproving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act
PassedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3062 · Sep 18, 2025 · Roll call 276On PassagePromoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 181On PassageLower Energy Costs Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 179On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 178On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 177On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 176On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 175On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0

Show 17 more

H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 174On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 173On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 29, 2023 · Roll call 172On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 29, 2023 · Roll call 171On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0

Cosponsors

3 active

Show all 3 cosponsors

Troy Balderson (R-OH-12)
Neal P. Dunn (R-FL-2)
Michael Lawler (R-NY-17)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

All voting members	392	9	2%

1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 51% of 114 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
94Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:YeaBroke with partyProjected: 94 Swing
ContactCall 202-225-6306 Website
2
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York 4th · Lean D+2House Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 21% of 24 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
94Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:NayProjected: 94 Swing
3
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 40% of 117 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
93Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:NayBroke with party
4
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 48% of 117 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
92Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:YeaBroke with party
5
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire 1st · Lean D+2House Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 16% of 117 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today91Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:Nay
6
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 49% of 117 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
90Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:YeaBroke with party
7
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENHouse Committee on Energy and CommerceOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 4% of 114 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today89Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:Yea
8
Adam GrayDemocrat · California 13th · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 62% of 23 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
88Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:YeaBroke with party
9
Donald G. DavisDemocrat · North Carolina 1st · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 49% of 116 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today87Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:YeaBroke with party
10
Jennifer A. KiggansRepublican · Virginia 2nd · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 6% of 116 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
86Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 12, 2025:YeaProjected: 86 Swing
ContactCall