Data: The Downballot · Federal Election Commission · Voteview · Congress.gov · Heritage Action · League of Conservation Voters. Partisan lean is computed by Congress Swing Tracker from presidential results (25% 2020 / 75% 2024); it is not the Cook PVI. Non-voting delegates are not ranked. Scores: model swing-v3. How the score works Contact Support this site S. 4949: Water Resources Development Act of 2026 · Congress Swing Tracker
Bills / S. 4949 S. 4949 · 119th Congress · Water Resources Development
Sponsored by Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) · 4 active cosponsors (what is this?) 1 Republican, 3 Democrats 1 R , 3 D
Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 457.
Why tracked (what is this?) Reported by committee (what is this?) Read the summary
Where it stands Hasn’t passed either chamber Senate : next House : not yet President : not yet 9 senators score as swing votes The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of this bill yet.
Committees and subjects Committees Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works · Senate Reported by · Markup by · Referred to Subjects Administrative law and regulatory procedures Advisory bodies Alabama Alaska Aquatic ecology Arizona Arkansas Army Corps of Engineers California Colorado Computer security and identity theft Congressional oversight Show all 77 subjects Connecticut Dams and canals Data collection, sharing, protection Delaware How the House breaks down 51 Swing 70–100201 Middle 30–70179 Entrenched 0–302 Insufficient data not rankedMembers fall into swing, middle and entrenched bands (what is this?)
Key players in the House Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional Directional mode (what is this?)
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, cross-pressure (what is this?) similar votes (what is this?) committee bonus (what is this?) Lean (what is this?)
Similar past votes, House Earlier roll calls (what is this?) similar-votes (what is this?)
Cosponsors 4 active Show all 4 cosponsors How the swing score works Ideology gap How far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.
Scorecard gap How far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.
Cross-pressure How strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.
Similar votes How often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.
Committee bonus Members of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.
Cosponsor check The sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.
District of Columbia
Employment and training programs
Environmental assessment, monitoring, research
Fires
Floods and storm protection
Florida
Forests, forestry, trees
Geography and mapping
Georgia
Government information and archives
Government studies and investigations
Hawaii
Horticulture and plants
Hydrology and hydrography
Illinois
Indiana
Infrastructure development
Kansas
Kentucky
Lakes and rivers
Louisiana
Marine and coastal resources, fisheries
Marine and inland water transportation
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Mississippi River
Missouri
Missouri River
Navigation, waterways, harbors
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York State
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Public-private cooperation
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington State
Water quality
Water resources funding
Water storage
Water use and supply
Watersheds
West Virginia
Wetlands
Wildlife conservation and habitat protection completeness (what is this?)
1 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 93 Swing
2 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 90 Swing
3 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 90 Swing
4 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 89 Swing
5 Don Bacon Republican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 88 Swing
6 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 88 Swing
7 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 87 Swing
8 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 85 Swing
9 Adam Gray Democrat · California 13th · Lean R+1 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 85 Swing
10 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 85 Swing
Show the other 41 swing representatives 11 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 84 Swing
12 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 84 Swing
13 Susie Lee Democrat · Nevada 3rd · Lean D+1 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 84 Swing
14 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 84 Swing
15 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 84 Swing
16 Nick LaLota Republican · New York 1st · Lean R+4 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 82 Swing
17 Kevin Kiley Independent · California 3rd · Lean R+2 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 82 Swing
18 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 82 Swing
19 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 82 Swing
20 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 81 Swing
21 Chris Pappas Democrat · New Hampshire 1st · Lean D+2 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 81 Swing
22 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 81 Swing
23 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 81 Swing
24 Jim Costa Democrat · California 21st · Lean D+4 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 81 Swing
25 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 80 Swing
26 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 80 Swing
27 Derek Tran Democrat · California 45th · Lean D+1 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 79 Swing
28 Gabe Evans Republican · Colorado 8th · Lean EVEN On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 79 Swing
29 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 78 Swing
30 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 77 Swing
31 Jeff Hurd Republican · Colorado 3rd · Lean R+5 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 77 Swing
32 Raul Ruiz Democrat · California 25th · Lean D+3 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 77 Swing
33 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 77 Swing
34 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 76 Swing
35 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 76 Swing
36 Young Kim Republican · California 40th · Lean R+1 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 75 Swing
37 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 75 Swing
38 Gabe Vasquez Democrat · New Mexico 2nd · Lean EVEN On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 75 Swing
39 Kim Schrier Democrat · Washington 8th · Lean D+3 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 74 Swing
40 Mike Carey Republican · Ohio 15th · Lean R+4 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 74 Swing
41 Ken Calvert Republican · California 41st · Lean R+2 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 73 Swing
42 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 73 Swing
43 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 71 Swing
44 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 71 Swing
45 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 71 Swing
46 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 71 Swing
47 Josh Riley Democrat · New York 19th · Lean D+1 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 71 Swing
48 Dan Newhouse Republican · Washington 4th · Lean R+10 On the ballot Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 71 Swing
49 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 71 Swing
50 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 70 Swing
51 Ideology gap Scorecard gap Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat 70 Swing
Not enough data to rank (2) These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.
— Aisha Wahab Democrat · California 14th · Lean D+20 On the ballot 29% of inputs · missing DW-NOMINATE, scorecards Ideology gap No data Scorecard gap No data Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat — Insufficient data
— Everton Blair Democrat · Georgia 13th · Lean D+21 On the ballot 29% of inputs · missing DW-NOMINATE, scorecards Ideology gap No data Scorecard gap No data Cross-pressure Similar votes Not applicable Committee No committee seat — Insufficient data
Ideology vs. swing score, House Click any dot to see which member it is. With the keyboard, tab to the chart and use the arrow keys.
Swing score
SWING ZONE 70+
Entrenched below 30
← More liberal DW-NOMINATE ideology score More conservative →
Ideology is each member’s DW-NOMINATE (what is this?)
Not applicable in the House. There is not enough similar voting history (weight 0.5 of 5.0 needed), so this input is left out of the score rather than counted as missing.
H.R. 131 · Jan 8, 2026 · Roll call 369Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act
Failed Same policy area ×0.5
