Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-DE) · 4 active : 3 Republicans, 1 Democrat
Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 93.
Finding Opportunities for Resource Exploration Act or the Finding ORE Act
This bill allows the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to enter into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to partner with a foreign country in mapping the country's reserves of critical minerals and rare earth elements.
A
critical mineral is
any mineral, element, substance, or material designated as critical by USGS because it is essential to U.S. economic and national security, has a vulnerable supply chain, and serves an essential function in manufacturing a product.
Rare earth elements
have catalytic, magnetic, electrical, and luminescent properties vital for civilian and defense purposes.
In negotiating a MOU, USGS must seek to increase the security and resilience of international supply chains for critical minerals and rare earth elements by
committing to assisting the partner foreign country through cooperative activities that help it map reserves;
ensuring that private companies headquartered in the United States or an allied foreign country are offered the right of first refusal in the further development of critical minerals and rare earth elements in the partner foreign country;
facilitating private-sector investment in the exploration and development of critical minerals and rare earth elements; and
ensuring that the mapping data is protected against unauthorized access by, or disclosure to, governmental or private entities based in non-allied countries.
USGS must obtain the concurrence of the Department of State in
Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Loading similar votes
prioritizing and selecting partner foreign countries,
negotiating or implementing a MOU, and
notifying and reporting to Congress about issues related to a MOU.
These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.


Ideology is each member’s score. The most moderate members of each party sit nearest the center line and highest on the chart. 2 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 60.0 (needs 5.0).