Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) · 2 active : 1 Republican, 1 Democrat
Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 520.
Expedited Access to Biosimilars Act
This bill modifies statutory requirements for demonstrating that a proposed biological product (e.g., a drug or vaccine) is biosimilar to a reference (brand-name) product. Specifically, the bill eliminates the need for a clinical efficacy study unless the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determines such a study is necessary.
Under current law, applicants seeking FDA approval of a proposed biosimilar must submit certain studies and assessments, including a clinical efficacy study demonstrating the safety, purity, and potency of the proposed biosimilar in relevant conditions of use. However, the FDA has discretion not to require studies and assessments it deems unnecessary. (For example, the FDA released draft guidance in October 2025 indicating that clinical efficacy studies may be unnecessary for a class of proposed biosimilars, known as therapeutic protein products, in some circumstances.)
The bill generally eliminates the requirement that a biosimilar applicant submit a clinical efficacy study but authorizes the FDA to require such a study if necessary. If requiring a clinical efficacy study, the FDA must provide a written determination of necessity to the applicant within a specified period.
Separately, the bill eliminates a requirement that a biosimilar application be reviewed by the same FDA division responsible for review of the reference application.
Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Loading similar votes
These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.


Ideology is each member’s score. The most moderate members of each party sit nearest the center line and highest on the chart. 2 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 8.5 (needs 5.0).