Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI) · 73 active : 37 Republicans, 34 Democrats, 2 Independents
Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act of 2025 or the CONNECT for Health Act of
2025
This bill expands coverage of telehealth services under Medicare.
Among other provisions, the bill
permanently removes geographic restrictions on originating sites (i.e., the location of the beneficiary) and allows the home of the beneficiary to serve as the originating site for all services;
permanently allows federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics to serve as the distant site (i.e., the location of the health care practitioner); and
allows the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to generally waive coverage restrictions during any public health emergency.
Additionally, the CMS must post certain information about the effects of Medicare telehealth services on its website, including information about utilization, costs, and the outcome of services. The CMS must also (1) provide resources to health care professionals about the requirements for furnishing telehealth services under Medicare, including with respect to payment, patient privacy, and support for underserved populations; and (2) ensure certain quality measures are applied to telehealth services.
No legislative subjects recorded yet. Similar-vote matching falls back to the policy area.
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Loading similar votes
Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 72 sponsor and cosponsors in the Senate: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched.
Not applicable in the Senate. There is not enough similar voting history (weight 4.5 of 5.0 needed), so this input is left out of the score rather than counted as missing.