Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Sen. John W. Hickenlooper (D-CO) · 1 active : 1 Republican
Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 90.
Insure Cybersecurity Act of 2025
This bill requires the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to establish a working group on cyber insurance policies. Under the bill, these are defined as policies that offer coverage for losses, damages, and costs incurred due to cyberattacks and related incidents.
The working group is directed to analyze and address issues in the cyber insurance market facing both insurers and their customers. Specifically, the working group must develop information for customers on how to effectively evaluate policy options, and for insurers on how to clearly communicate with customers regarding policy provisions.
Additionally, the working group is directed to analyze and explain in layman’s terms
terminology commonly used in cyber insurance policies, including terminology used to include or exclude coverage for losses from cyber incidents;
how common policy provisions correspond to cyber incidents and potential responses, including ransomware and potential ransom payments; and
constraints faced by insurers in covering higher losses in cyber risk areas, such as reputational damage and loss of intellectual property.
At the conclusion of the working group's term, NTIA must publish and disseminate informative resources for cyber insurance stakeholders, including any recommendations formulated by the working group.
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Loading similar votes

Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 2 sponsor and cosponsors in the Senate: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched.
Not applicable in the Senate. There is not enough similar voting history (weight 1.0 of 5.0 needed), so this input is left out of the score rather than counted as missing.