Loading bill breakdown…
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
92Swing
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) · 0 active
Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of this bill yet.
Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Loading similar votes
This bill has no cosponsors.
These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.
Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 1 sponsor and cosponsor in the House: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched. 2 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 30.0 (needs 5.0).
