Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Rep. Eric A. "Rick" Crawford (R-AR) · 0 active
Latest action: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 198 - 218 (Roll no. 221).
This bill extends the authorities of Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) until July 2, 2026.
Title VII of FISA generally addresses electronic surveillance and other methods of acquiring foreign intelligence information that are directed at targets outside the United States. Title VII includes surveillance under Section 702, which concerns acquiring communications of non-U.S. persons believed to be outside the United States to obtain foreign intelligence information. Information about U.S. persons may incidentally be acquired by this type of surveillance and subsequently
queried
(searched) under certain circumstances.
For additional information, see
CRS In Focus,
IF11451 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)
; and
CRS Report,
R48592 FISA Section 702 and the 2024 Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act
.
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 54 | 5 | 9% |
| Middle | 257 | 16 | 6% |
| Entrenched | 104 | 5 | 5% |
Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Loading similar votes
This bill has no cosponsors.
| Insufficient data |
|---|
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0% |
| All voting members | 416 | 26 | 6% |
|---|
: Pair any member who broke with one who stayed with their party: in 49% of those pairs, the one who broke had the higher swing score before the vote. Chance would be 50%.
Projections from swing-v3-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.




These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.


Ringed dots broke with their party on the vote.
Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 1 sponsor and cosponsor in the House: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched. 2 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 72.0 (needs 5.0).