Loading bill breakdown…
H.R. 7037119th CongressInternational Affairs
Developing Overseas Mineral Investments and New Allied Networks for Critical Energies Act
Sponsored by Rep. Young Kim (R-CA) · 30 active : 20 Republicans, 10 Democrats
Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate9 senators score as swing votes
Passed House
- House: passedJun 8, 2026
- Senate: next
- President: not yet
Summary
, via Congress.govDeveloping Overseas Mineral Investments and New Allied Networks for Critical Energies Act or the DOMINANCE Act
This bill establishes a Bureau of Energy Security and Diplomacy in the Department of State and authorizes several programs to address access to energy and critical minerals.
The bureau must formulate and implement policies related to international energy, energy technology, critical minerals, and related supply chains. An assistant secretary is authorized to lead the bureau.
Read full summaryHide full summary
The bill authorizes the State Department to establish multi-year energy security compacts with partner countries. The purpose of such compacts is to increase reliable access to energy, electricity, or critical minerals for both parties to the compact.
The bill also authorizes the State Department to lead U.S. participation in a Minerals Security Partnership (MSP), whose purpose includes supporting investment in critical mineral mining, processing, and refining projects that enable critical mineral supply chains. The United States must prioritize MSP projects that advance the national and economic security interests of the United States and U.S. allies and partners.
Fellowships are authorized to support (1) U.S. citizens attending foreign mining institutions in order to build the capacity of the U.S. mining workforce; and (2) foreign mining academics and professionals being placed at U.S. institutions to help advance research and development initiatives in the U.S. mining industry and expand U.S. mining education and workforce development programs.
How the projections held up
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
House
Passed by voice vote or unanimous consent: no individual votes recorded.
Committees and subjects
Committees
- House Committee on Foreign Affairs · HouseMarkup by · Referred to
- Senate Committee on Foreign Relations · SenateReferred to
Subjects
- Advisory bodies
- Congressional oversight
- Data collection, sharing, protection
- Department of State
- Diplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroad
- Ecology
- Economic development
- Energy storage, supplies, demand
- Executive agency funding and structure
- Federal officials
- Higher education
- International exchange and broadcasting
Show all 21 subjects
How the Senate breaks down
- 9Swing 70–100
- 62Middle 30–70
- 29Entrenched 0–30
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score.
Key players in the Senate
Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v2, directional: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Similar past votes, Senate
Earlier behind swing-v3’s inputLoading similar votes
Cosponsors
30 activeShow all 30 cosponsors
- Ami Bera (D-CA-6)
- Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen (R-AS-AL)
- Bill Huizenga (R-MI-4)
- Brian J. Mast (R-FL-21)
- Dina Titus (D-NV-1)
- Greg Stanton (D-AZ-4)
- Jefferson Shreve (R-IN-6)
- Jimmy Panetta (D-CA-19)
- Joaquin Castro (D-TX-20)
- Johnny Olszewski (D-MD-2)
- Michael Lawler (R-NY-17)
- Robert J. Wittman (R-VA-1)
- Tim Moore (R-NC-14)
- Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL-27)
- Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA-1)
- John R. Moolenaar (R-MI-2)
- Vince Fong (R-CA-20)
- Eugene Simon Vindman
How the swing score works
Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.
Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.
Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.
Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.
Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.
Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.
