Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE) · 4 active : 2 Republicans, 2 Democrats
Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.
Least Cost Exception Act
This bill allows the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to waive the least-cost resolution requirement for failed insured depository institutions and use alternative methods of resolution, particularly alternatives that do not involve global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).
Under current law, the FDIC must use the resolution method (such as a deposit payoff or the purchase and assumption of a bank’s assets and liabilities) that costs the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund the least to implement when an insured depository institution fails.
The bill provides an exception to this requirement if the following criteria are met:
the alternative method is the least costly of all alternatives that do not involve a G-SIB and that do not exceed the cost of liquidation;
the difference in cost between the selected alternative and the cost of a resolution involving a purchase and assumption by a G-SIB is less than a maximum cost as established by rule;
if the alternative involves a person purchasing assets or assuming liabilities, that person must pay an assessment to the FDIC; and
it is determined that the risks to the fund are outweighed by the benefits of limiting the concentration of U.S. banking under G-SIBs.
FDIC must issue a report on any use of the exception established by this bill containing an analysis of the economic impact of cost differences between the selected alternative and the least-cost alternative.
Members fall into . 6 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Loading similar votes








These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.






Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 5 sponsor and cosponsors in the House: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched. 6 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 20.5 (needs 5.0).