Loading bill breakdown…
H.R. 2152119th CongressFinance and Financial Sector
AI PLAN Act
Sponsored by Rep. Zachary Nunn (R-IA) · 7 active : 2 Republicans, 5 Democrats
Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 615.
Where it standsBefore the House66 representatives score as swing votes
Hasn’t passed either chamber
- House: next
- Senate: not yet
- President: not yet
Summary
, via Congress.govArtificial Intelligence Practices, Logistics, Actions, and Necessities Act or the AI PLAN Act
This bill requires the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of Commerce to submit a report on the risks posed by the use of artificial intelligence in the commission of financial crimes by adversarial actors.
The report must
Read full summaryHide full summary
describe interagency, intergovernmental, and public-private partnership activities, policies, and procedures to defend U.S. interests against the national and economic security risks posed by the use of artificial intelligence in the commission of financial crimes;
provide a list of readily available resources that can be immediately deployed by federal agencies to combat these risks, and
provide a list of resources needed by federal agencies to combat these risks.
Risks that must be considered by the report include deepfakes, voice cloning, foreign election interference, synthetic identities, false flags that disrupt market operations, AI-supported social engineering, and general digital fraud.
After submission of this report, Treasury, DHS, and Commerce must make recommendations for legislation and best practices for businesses and government entities to address these risks.
Committees and subjects
Committees
- House Committee on Financial Services · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
Subjects
- Advanced technology and technological innovations
- Advisory bodies
- Computers and information technology
- Data collection, sharing, protection
- Digital media
- Fraud offenses and financial crimes
- Government information and archives
- Government studies and investigations
- Internet, web applications, social media
Model
Directional: count only breaks toward the other partyWhy do scores change?v3default (selected)v2 model swing-v2
How the Senate breaks down
- 11Swing 70–100
- 65Middle 30–70
- 24Entrenched 0–30
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score. The bill is not before the Senate right now; these scores show where members would stand.
Key players in the Senate
Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Similar past votes, Senate
Earlier behind swing-v3’s inputLoading similar votes
Cosponsors
7 activeShow all 7 cosponsors
- James A. Himes (D-CT-4)
- Nicholas J. Begich (R-AK-AL)
- Nathaniel Moran (R-TX-1)
- Eugene Simon Vindman (D-VA-7)
- Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ-5)
- Laura Gillen (D-NY-4)
- Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-MI-8)
How the swing score works
Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.
Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.
Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.
Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.
Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.
Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.
