Data: The Downballot · Federal Election Commission · Voteview · Congress.gov · Heritage Action · League of Conservation Voters.Partisan lean is computed by Congress Swing Tracker from presidential results (25% 2020 / 75% 2024); it is not the Cook PVI. Non-voting delegates are not ranked. Scores: model swing-v3. How the score worksContactSupport this site
H.R. 187: MAPWaters Act of 2025 · Congress Swing Tracker
H.R. 187·119th Congress·Public Lands and Natural Resources
MAPWaters Act of 2025
Sponsored by Rep. Blake D. Moore (R-UT) · 3 active : 1 Republican, 2 Democrats1 R, 2 D
Modernizing Access to our Public Waters Act or the MAPWaters Act of 2025 or the MAPWaters Act of 2025
This act directs the Forest Service and the Department of the Interior to standardize and publish data relating to the public's access to federal waterways for recreational use.
Read full summaryHide full summary
(Sec. 3) The Forest Service and Interior must jointly develop and adopt interagency standards for data collection and dissemination of geospatial data relating to public outdoor recreational access of federal waterways and federal fishing restrictions. The standards must ensure compatibility and interoperability among applicable federal databases with respect to collection and dissemination of such data.
(Sec. 4) Within five years, the Forest Service and Interior must also digitize and make publicly available online certain geographic information system data about (1) federal waterway restrictions, (2) federal waterway access and navigation information, and (3) federal fishing restrictions. They must also update the data about waterway restrictions, waterway access, and navigation information at least twice per year. Data about fishing restrictions must be updated in real time as changes go into effect.
The Forest Service and Interior must also develop a process to allow members of the public to submit questions or comments regarding the data regarding waterway restrictions, waterway access, and navigation information.
The requirements under this section do not apply to irrigation canals and flowage easements.
(Sec. 5) To carry out the act, the Forest Service and Interior may (1) coordinate and partner with nonfederal agencies, private entities, and nonprofit partners; and (2) enter into agreements with third parties.
How the projections held up
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
House
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedPassed413 yea, 0 nayJanuary 21, 2025 · Roll call 19
How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote
VotedVoted yea or nay
BrokeBroke with party
Share
Swing
43
0
0%
Middle
190
0
0%
Entrenched
105
0
0%
Committees and subjects
Committees
House Committee on Agriculture · HouseReferred to
House Committee on Natural Resources · HouseReferred to
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · SenateDischarged from · Referred to
Members fall into . 5 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.
Key players in the House
Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.
Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.
Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.
Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.
Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.
Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.
The Forest Service and Interior may work with the U.S. Geological Survey to collect, aggregate, digitize, standardize, and publish data on their behalf.
(Sec. 6) The Forest Service and Interior must annually report to specified congressional committees on their progress in meeting the requirements of this act.
Insufficient data
66
0
0%
All voting members
404
0
0%
Too few members broke with their party to measure .
Projections from swing-v3-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.
Senate
Passed by voice vote or unanimous consent: no individual votes recorded.
Outdoor recreation
Where the House has voted, each member’s appears with the projection made before it.
1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 34% of 25 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
100Swing
Vote on passage, Jan 21, 2025:YeaProjected: 100 Swing
Similar votesNo dataCommitteeNo committee seatToo few votes on similar bills to measure
—Insufficient data
Ideology vs. swing score, House
Democrat
Republican
Independent
Click any dot to see which member it is. With the keyboard, tab to the chart and use the arrow keys.
Swing score
SWING ZONE 70+Entrenched below 30
← More liberalDW-NOMINATE ideology scoreMore conservative →
Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 4 sponsor and cosponsors in the House: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched. 5 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 13.0 (needs 5.0).
H.R. 4219 · Sep 14, 2026 · Roll call 656On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedNational Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species Strike Team Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 5103 · Mar 25, 2026 · Roll call 461On PassageMake the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 556 · Mar 18, 2026 · Roll call 453On PassageProtecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4294 · Mar 17, 2026 · Roll call 448On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedMAWS Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 261 · Feb 11, 2026 · Roll call 427On PassageUndersea Cable Protection Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 140 · Jan 21, 2026 · Roll call 398On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 130 · Nov 18, 2025 · Roll call 293On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment”
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 105 · Sep 3, 2025 · Roll call 225On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan”
PassedSame policy area×0.5
Show 17 more
H.J.Res. 106 · Sep 3, 2025 · Roll call 224On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan”
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 104 · Sep 3, 2025 · Roll call 223On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment”
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 2215 · May 14, 2025 · Roll call 124On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassSalem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 249 · May 13, 2025 · Roll call 123On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassTo redesignate certain facilities at Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park in honor of Congressman Bill Pascrell, Jr.
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 276 · May 8, 2025 · Roll call 121On PassageGulf of America Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 60 · Apr 29, 2025 · Roll call 109On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to “Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles”
PassedSame policy area×0.5
S.J.Res. 11 · Mar 6, 2025 · Roll call 60On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to “Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources”
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 471 · Jan 23, 2025 · Roll call 24On PassageFix Our Forests Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 8219 · Dec 4, 2024 · Roll call 1199On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedLahaina National Heritage Area Study Act
H.R. 6009 · Mar 20, 2024 · Roll call 813On PassageRestoring American Energy Dominance Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 2872 · Jan 18, 2024 · Roll call 733On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Concur in the Senate AmendmentTo amend the Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013 to allow the Secretary of the Interior to issue electronic stamps under such Act, and for other purposes
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 359 · Nov 6, 2023 · Roll call 595On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassFort San Geronimo Preservation Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
S.J.Res. 9 · Jul 27, 2023 · Roll call 380On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, U.S. Code, relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Sec. 4(d) Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Population Segment”
Adam GrayDemocrat · California 13th · Lean R+1House Committee on AgricultureHouse Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballotIdeology gapScorecard gapCross-pressureSimilar votesCommitteeBroke with party on 33% of 16 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCVToday94SwingVote on passage, Jan 21, 2025:Yea
Jennifer A. KiggansRepublican · Virginia 2nd · Lean EVENHouse Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballotIdeology gapScorecard gapCross-pressureSimilar votesCommitteeBroke with party on 10% of 26 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCVToday92SwingVote on passage, Jan 21, 2025:Yea
