Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Rep. Craig A. Goldman (R-TX) · 13 active : 13 Republicans
Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-9.
This joint resolution eliminates new, more stringent energy conservation standards for commercial refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers. Under the joint resolution, such equipment is no longer required to comply with the new standards.
Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the
rule
titled
Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Refrigerators, Freezers, and Refrigerator-Freezers
and published by the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy on January 21, 2025. Under the rule, the office adopted new energy conservation standards for commercial refrigeration equipment to achieve the maximum improvement in energy efficiency that is technologically feasible and economically justified. The rule required the equipment to comply with the those standards by January 22, 2029.
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 48 | 5 | 10% |
| Middle | 232 | 0 | 0% |
| Entrenched | 119 | 0 | 0% |
| All |
Members fall into . 3 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Loading similar votes
| 399 |
| 5 |
| 1% |
: Pair any member who broke with one who stayed with their party: in 99% of those pairs, the one who broke had the higher swing score before the vote. Chance would be 50%.
Projections from swing-v3-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| Middle | 59 | 0 | 0% |
| Entrenched | 27 | 0 | 0% |
| All voting members | 95 | 0 | 0% |
Too few members broke with their party to measure .
Projections from swing-v3-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.

These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.



Ringed dots broke with their party on the vote.
Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 14 sponsor and cosponsors in the House: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched. 3 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 68.0 (needs 5.0).