Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Rep. Stephanie I. Bice (R-OK) · 10 active : 10 Republicans
Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-7.
This joint resolution eliminates new, more stringent energy conservation standards for certain walk-in coolers and freezers, including the new limits on maximum daily energy consumption for walk-in non-display doors. Under the joint resolution, walk-in non-display doors and walk-in refrigeration systems are no longer required to comply with the new standards.
Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the
rule
titled
Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers
and submitted by the Department of Energy (DOE) on December 23, 2024. Under the rule, DOE adopted energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and freezers to achieve the maximum improvement in energy efficiency that DOE determined was technologically feasible and economically justified. The rule required walk-in non-display doors to comply with those standards by December 23, 2027, and walk-in refrigeration systems to comply with them by December 31, 2028.
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 48 | 6 | 13% |
| Middle | 216 | 0 | 0% |
| Entrenched | 113 | 0 | 0% |
| All |
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score. The bill is not before the Senate right now; these scores show where members would stand.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has. Where the Senate has voted, each member’s appears with the projection made before it.

Loading similar votes
| 377 |
| 6 |
| 2% |
: Pair any member who broke with one who stayed with their party: in 99% of those pairs, the one who broke had the higher swing score before the vote. Chance would be 50%.
Projections from swing-v3-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 11 | 0 | 0% |
| Middle | 47 | 0 | 0% |
| Entrenched | 22 | 0 | 0% |
| Insufficient data | 13 | 0 | 0% |
| All voting members | 93 | 0 | 0% |
Too few members broke with their party to measure .
Projections from swing-v3-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.
Ideology is each member’s score. The most moderate members of each party sit nearest the center line and highest on the chart.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the Senate: total similarity weight 18.0 (needs 5.0).