Loading bill breakdown…
H.Con.Res. 93119th CongressInternational Affairs
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Sponsored by Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA) · 14 active : 14 Democrats
Latest action: Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate9 senators score as swing votes
Passed House
- House: passedSep 15, 2026
- Senate: next
Summary
, via Congress.govThis concurrent resolution directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a congressional authorization for use of military force against Iran.
Read full summaryHide full summary
Elements of the U.S. Armed Forces needed to defend the United States, an ally, or a partner from imminent attack are not covered by this requirement provided the President complies with a specified provision of the War Powers Resolution. (The provision generally requires the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities no more than 60 days after the President notifies or is required to notify Congress of such involvement, unless Congress authorizes such use. For more information on the War Powers Resolution, see
CRS In Focus 13134
.)
How the projections held up
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
House
On Agreeing to the ResolutionPassed220 yea, 204 naySeptember 15, 2026 · Roll call 307
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 62 | 4 | 6% |
| Middle | 218 | 3 | 1% |
| Entrenched | 141 | 0 | 0% |
| Insufficient data |
Committees and subjects
Committees
- House Committee on Foreign Affairs · HouseReferred to
- Senate Committee on Foreign Relations · SenateReferred to
Subjects
- Conflicts and wars
- Congressional-executive branch relations
- Iran
- Middle East
- Military operations and strategy
- Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents
- War and emergency powers
Model
Directional: count only breaks toward the other partyWhy do scores change?v3default (selected)v2 model swing-v2
How the Senate breaks down
- 9Swing 70–100
- 72Middle 30–70
- 19Entrenched 0–30
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score.
Key players in the Senate
Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Similar past votes, Senate
Earlier behind swing-v3’s inputLoading similar votes
Cosponsors
14 activeShow all 14 cosponsors
- Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA-6)
- Eugene Simon Vindman (D-VA-7)
- Jake Auchincloss (D-MA-4)
- Jason Crow (D-CO-6)
- Jimmy Panetta (D-CA-19)
- Maggie Goodlander (D-NH-2)
- Patrick Ryan (D-NY-18)
- Robert C. "Bobby" Scott (D-VA-3)
- Mike Thompson (D-CA-4)
- Ted Lieu (D-CA-36)
- Salud O. Carbajal (D-CA-24)
- Derek Tran (D-CA-45)
- Jared F. Golden (D-ME-2)
- Mike Quigley (D-IL-5)
How the swing score works
Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.
Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.
Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.
Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.
Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.
Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.
