Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.Res. 1498: In the matter of allegations relating to Representative Chuck Edwards. · Congress Swing Tracker

H.Res. 1498119th CongressCongress

In the matter of allegations relating to Representative Chuck Edwards.

Sponsored by Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS) · 0 active

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Read the summary

Where it standsBefore the House

Adopted

House: passedSep 1, 2026

57 representatives score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

This resolution censures Representative Chuck Edwards of North Carolina.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On Agreeing to the ResolutionPassed413 yea, 2 naySeptember 1, 2026 · Roll call 292

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	55	1	2%
Middle	237	1	0%
Entrenched	121	0	0%
Insufficient data

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Ethics · HouseReported original measure

Subjects

Government ethics and transparency, public corruption
House of Representatives
Members of Congress
North Carolina

Senate · 0 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

57Swing 70–100
245Middle 30–70
128Entrenched 0–30
3Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 3 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 32.5 (needs 5.0).

H.R. 7008 · Jul 22, 2026 · Roll call 640On PassageStop Insider Trading Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 1336 · Jun 4, 2026 · Roll call 563On Agreeing to the ResolutionWaiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 1274 · May 13, 2026 · Roll call 521On Agreeing to the ResolutionProviding that section 11 of House Resolution 1224 shall have no force or effect
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 1175 · Apr 17, 2026 · Roll call 483On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 1142 · Mar 27, 2026 · Roll call 468On Agreeing to the ResolutionProviding for disposition of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 7147) Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 893 · Nov 19, 2025 · Roll call 301On Motion to ReferCensuring Representative Cory Mills and Removing Him From the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 878 · Nov 18, 2025 · Roll call 291On Agreeing to the ResolutionDisapproving the behavior of Representative Jesus G. “Chuy” Garcia of Illinois
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 566 · Jul 2, 2025 · Roll call 187On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0

Show 17 more

H.Res. 282 · Apr 1, 2025 · Roll call 86On Agreeing to the ResolutionProvidng for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J.Res. 18 and S.J.Res 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 189 · Mar 6, 2025 · Roll call 61On Agreeing to the ResolutionCensuring Representative Al Green of Texas
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 1608 · Dec 5, 2024 · Roll call 1208On Motion to ReferRaising a Question of the Privileges of the House
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.Res. 1292 · Jun 12, 2024 · Roll call 978On Agreeing to the ResolutionResolution Recommending that the House of Representatives find United States Attorney General Merrick B. Garland in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply with a Subpoena Duly Issued by the Committee on the Judiciary

Cosponsors

0 active

This bill has no cosponsors.

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

All voting members	415	2	0%

1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 20% of 43 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
94Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 94 Swing
ContactCall 202-225-6306 Website
2
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 35% of 40 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 93 Swing
ContactCall
3
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 23% of 42 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 93 Swing
Contact
4
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York 17th · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 18% of 42 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 92 Swing
ContactCall
5
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 15% of 41 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
91Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 91 Swing
ContactCall
6
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 17% of 38 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
90Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 90 Swing
ContactCall
7
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 13% of 43 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
89Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 89 Swing
ContactCall
8
David G. ValadaoRepublican · California 22nd · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 12% of 41 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
88Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 88 Swing
ContactCall
9
Donald G. DavisDemocrat · North Carolina 1st · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 18% of 41 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
88Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 88 Swing
ContactCall
10
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey 5th · Lean D+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 12% of 41 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action
88Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 1, 2026:YeaProjected: 88 Swing
ContactCall