Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.Res. 481: Condemning the rise in ideologically motivated attacks on Jewish individuals in the United States, including the recent violent assault in Boulder, Colorado, and reaffirming the House of Representatives commitment to combating antisemitism and politically motivated violence. · Congress Swing Tracker

H.Res. 481119th CongressCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

Condemning the rise in ideologically motivated attacks on Jewish individuals in the United States, including the recent violent assault in Boulder, Colorado, and reaffirming the House of Representatives commitment to combating antisemitism and politically motivated violence.

Sponsored by Rep. Jefferson Van Drew (R-NJ) · 70 active : 55 Republicans, 15 Democrats

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Read the summary

Where it standsBefore the House

Adopted

House: passedJun 9, 2025

35 representatives score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

This resolution condemns the June 1, 2025, targeted act of terror in Boulder, Colorado, as an act of ideologically motivated violence and reaffirms the House of Representatives' commitment to protecting the rights of all Americans to assemble peacefully and practice their faith without fear of violence.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreePassed400 yea, 0 nayJune 9, 2025 · Roll call 159

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	27	0	0%
Middle	147	0	0%
Entrenched	221	0	0%
All

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on the Judiciary · HouseReferred to

Subjects

Colorado
First Amendment rights
Religion
Violent crime

Senate · 0 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

35Swing 70–100
177Middle 30–70
219Entrenched 0–30
2Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v2, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has. Where the House has voted, each member’s appears with the projection made before it.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Not applicable in the House. There is not enough similar voting history (weight 3.0 of 5.0 needed), so this input is left out of the score rather than counted as missing.

H.R. 6090 · May 1, 2024 · Roll call 890On PassageAntisemitism Awareness Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 28 · Jan 14, 2025 · Roll call 11On PassageProtection of Women and Girls in Sports Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
S. 2861 · Sep 17, 2024 · Roll call 1137On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassBillie Jean King Congressional Gold Medal Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 734 · Apr 20, 2023 · Roll call 191On PassageProtection of Women and Girls in Sports Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 734 · Apr 20, 2023 · Roll call 189On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame policy area×0.5

Cosponsors

70 active

Show all 70 cosponsors

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 89 Swing (today: 92)
ContactCall 202-225-6306 Website
2
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today90Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 85 Swing (today: 90)
ContactCall
3
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today88Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 81 Swing (today: 88)
ContactCall
4
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today86Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 80 Swing (today: 86)
ContactCall
5
David G. ValadaoRepublican · California 22nd · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today85Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 78 Swing (today: 85)
ContactCall
6
Thomas R. SuozziDemocrat · New York 3rd · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today84Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 78 Swing (today: 84)
ContactCall
7
Donald G. DavisDemocrat · North Carolina 1st · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today84Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 76 Swing (today: 84)
ContactCall
8
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada 3rd · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today83Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 76 Swing (today: 83)
ContactCall
9
Adam GrayDemocrat · California 13th · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today83Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 77 Swing (today: 83)
ContactCall
10
Jennifer A. KiggansRepublican · Virginia 2nd · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today83Swing
Vote on passage, Jun 9, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 79 Swing (today: 83)
ContactCall