Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.Res. 481: Condemning the rise in ideologically motivated attacks on Jewish individuals in the United States, including the recent violent assault in Boulder, Colorado, and reaffirming the House of Representatives commitment to combating antisemitism and politically motivated violence. · Congress Swing Tracker

H.Res. 481119th CongressCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

Condemning the rise in ideologically motivated attacks on Jewish individuals in the United States, including the recent violent assault in Boulder, Colorado, and reaffirming the House of Representatives commitment to combating antisemitism and politically motivated violence.

Sponsored by Rep. Jefferson Van Drew (R-NJ) · 70 active : 55 Republicans, 15 Democrats

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Read the summary

Where it standsBefore the House

Adopted

House: passedJun 9, 2025

40 representatives score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

This resolution condemns the June 1, 2025, targeted act of terror in Boulder, Colorado, as an act of ideologically motivated violence and reaffirms the House of Representatives' commitment to protecting the rights of all Americans to assemble peacefully and practice their faith without fear of violence.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreePassed400 yea, 0 nayJune 9, 2025 · Roll call 159

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	27	0	0%
Middle	160	0	0%
Entrenched	208	0	0%
All

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on the Judiciary · HouseReferred to

Subjects

Colorado
First Amendment rights
Religion
Violent crime

Senate · 0 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

No swing scores for the Senate yet

Scores appear after the analytics job has scored this bill.

Similar past votes, Senate

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Not applicable in the Senate. There is not enough similar voting history (weight 0.5 of 5.0 needed), so this input is left out of the score rather than counted as missing.

S.J.Res. 4 · Apr 27, 2023 · Roll call 99On Cloture on the Motion to ProceedA joint resolution removing the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.
Cloture on the Motion to Proceed RejectedSame policy area×0.5

Cosponsors

70 active

Show all 70 cosponsors

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.