Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 8278: Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 8278119th CongressFinance and Financial Sector

Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act

Sponsored by Rep. Marlin A. Stutzman (R-IN) · 1 active : 1 Democrat

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedSep 15, 2026
Senate: next
President: not yet

14 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act

This bill requires specified federal financial agencies to assess their technological capabilities and procurement practices.

Read full summary

Specifically, agencies (the Federal Reserve Board, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Department of the Treasury, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the National Credit Union Administration) must assess the technology used by the agency and its capabilities to conduct real-time supervisory assessments of entities over which the agency has supervisory authority.

Additionally, the agencies must assess the applicable procurement rules and protocols when acquiring or developing new technological systems and identify any opportunities to streamline these procedures.

Every five years, these agencies must report to specified congressional committees. Among other topics, the report must contain an overview of the technology used in supervisory assessments and any anticipated upgrades, a description of procurement practices, an overview of the agency’s technology development workforce, and details regarding data sharing procedures.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedPassed417 yea, 7 naySeptember 15, 2026 · Roll call 302

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	67	0	0%
Middle	227	4	2%
Entrenched	124	3	2%

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Financial Services · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · SenateReferred to

Subjects

Computer security and identity theft
Computers and information technology
Intergovernmental relations
Public contracts and procurement
Technology assessment
Technology transfer and commercialization

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

72Swing 70–100
214Middle 30–70
141Entrenched 0–30
6Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 6 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 19.0 (needs 5.0).

H.R. 6955 · Jul 21, 2026 · Roll call 631On PassageMain Street Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 1181 · Jul 14, 2026 · Roll call 600On PassageProtecting Privacy in Purchases Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 327On PassageIncreasing Investor Opportunities Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 326On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 325On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 324On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3357 · Jul 23, 2025 · Roll call 216On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedEnhancing Multi-Class Share Disclosures Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 1919 · Jul 17, 2025 · Roll call 200On PassageAnti-CBDC Surveillance State Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5

Show 17 more

S. 1582 · Jul 17, 2025 · Roll call 199On PassageGENIUS Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3633 · Jul 17, 2025 · Roll call 198On PassageCLARITY Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
S.J.Res. 13 · May 20, 2025 · Roll call 136On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the Department of the Treasury relating to the review of applications under the Bank Merger Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
S.J.Res. 18 · Apr 9, 2025 · Roll call 95On PassageDisapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”

Cosponsors

1 active

Show all 1 cosponsors

Bill Foster (D-IL-11)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

All voting members	424	7	2%

1
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York 17th · Lean D+1House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 10% of 37 similar votes
99Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: 99 Swing
ContactCall 202-225-6506 Website
2
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey 5th · Lean D+2House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 24% of 36 similar votes
95Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: 95 Swing
3
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 33% of 38 similar votes
94Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: 94 Swing
ContactCall
4
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 37% of 38 similar votes
93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: 93 Swing
ContactCall
5
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 17% of 38 similar votes
93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: 93 Swing
ContactCall
6
Andrew R. GarbarinoRepublican · New York 2nd · Lean R+6House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 7% of 37 similar votes
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected at the vote: Swing
7
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 38% of 38 similar votes
92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: 92 Swing
ContactCall
8
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 8% of 38 similar votes
91Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: 91 Swing
ContactCall
9
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa 3rd · Lean R+2House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 6% of 35 similar votes
Today91Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected at the vote: Swing
10
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 8% of 37 similar votes
90Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: 90 Swing
ContactCall

Not enough data to rank (6)

These members have less than half of the model’s inputs, so their scores are not banded or ranked.

—
James GallagherRepublican · California 1st · Lean R+12On the ballot45% of inputs · missing scorecards, similar votes
Ideology gap
Scorecard gapNo dataCross-pressure
Similar votesNo dataCommitteeNo committee seatToo few votes on similar bills to measure
—Insufficient data
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: — Insufficient data
—
Analilia MejiaDemocrat · New Jersey 11th · Lean D+5On the ballot45% of inputs · missing scorecards, similar votes
Ideology gap
Scorecard gapNo dataCross-pressure
Similar votesNo dataCommitteeNo committee seatToo few votes on similar bills to measure
—Insufficient data
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: — Insufficient data
—
Clay FullerRepublican · Georgia 14th · Lean R+19On the ballot45% of inputs · missing scorecards, similar votes
Ideology gap
Scorecard gapNo dataCross-pressure
Similar votesNo dataCommitteeNo committee seatToo few votes on similar bills to measure
—Insufficient data
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: — Insufficient data
—
Christian D. MenefeeDemocrat · Texas 18th · Lean D+21On the ballot45% of inputs · missing scorecards, similar votes
Ideology gap
Scorecard gapNo dataCross-pressure
Similar votesNo dataCommitteeNo committee seatToo few votes on similar bills to measure
—Insufficient data
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: — Insufficient data
—
Aisha WahabDemocrat · California 14th · Lean D+20On the ballot20% of inputs · missing DW-NOMINATE, scorecards, similar votes
Ideology gapNo dataScorecard gapNo dataCross-pressure
Similar votesNo dataCommitteeNo committee seatToo few votes on similar bills to measure
—Insufficient data
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: — Insufficient data
—
Everton BlairDemocrat · Georgia 13th · Lean D+21On the ballot20% of inputs · missing DW-NOMINATE, scorecards, similar votes
Ideology gapNo dataScorecard gapNo dataCross-pressure
Similar votesNo dataCommitteeNo committee seatToo few votes on similar bills to measure
—Insufficient data
Vote on passage, Sep 15, 2026:YeaProjected: — Insufficient data