To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.

Committees and subjects

How the House breaks down

• 58Swing 70–100
• 202Middle 30–70
• 171Entrenched 0–30
• 2Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into swing, middle and entrenched bands (what is this?). 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.

This bill has no cosponsors.

Ideology is each member’s DW-NOMINATE (what is this?) score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 1 sponsor and cosponsor in the House: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched. 2 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.