Loading bill breakdown…
Loading bill breakdown…
Sponsored by Rep. Doris O. Matsui (D-CA) · 2 active : 1 Republican, 1 Democrat
Latest action: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 375.
Emergency Reporting Act
This bill requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate and report on emergency communications outages (e.g., 9-1-1 outages).
Specifically, the FCC must publish a general report on (1) the volume and nature of 9-1-1 outages that are not required to be reported under current outage notification rules, (2) the value and practicality of including visual information in outage notifications from communications providers, and (3) recommended changes to FCC rules to address these issues.
Separately, the FCC must hold annual public hearings on events for which the Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) was activated for at least a week. (DIRS is a reporting system that is activated during severe weather and other events impacting communications service. It enables communications providers to report outages and other degradations to service.) After each such hearing, the FCC must issue a report that includes information about the number, duration, and nature of all associated outages, along with recommendations for improving the resiliency of affected communications services or networks. Such reports must generally be made public on the FCC website.
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
| BandBand before the vote | VotedVoted yea or nay | BrokeBroke with party | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swing | 49 | 0 | 0% |
| Middle | 196 | 4 | 2% |
| Entrenched | 147 | 3 | 2% |
| All |
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score.
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Loading similar votes
| 392 |
| 7 |
| 2% |
: Pair any member who broke with one who stayed with their party: in 45% of those pairs, the one who broke had the higher swing score before the vote. Chance would be 50%.
Projections from swing-v2-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.
Ideology is each member’s score. The most moderate members of each party sit nearest the center line and highest on the chart.
Not applicable in the Senate. There is not enough similar voting history (weight 1.0 of 5.0 needed), so this input is left out of the score rather than counted as missing.