Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 4058: Enhancing Stakeholder Support and Outreach for Preparedness Grants Act · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 4058119th CongressEmergency Management

Enhancing Stakeholder Support and Outreach for Preparedness Grants Act

Sponsored by Rep. Daniel S. Goldman (D-NY) · 3 active : 1 Republican, 2 Democrats

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedNov 19, 2025
Senate: next
President: not yet

9 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Enhancing Stakeholder Support and Outreach for Preparedness Grants Act

This bill requires the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to provide outreach and support to stakeholders regarding grants for protecting communities from terrorist attacks.

Read full summary

Specifically, FEMA must provide ongoing outreach and technical assistance to public entities and other stakeholders before, during, and after awarding grants under the State Homeland Security Grant Program and the Urban Area Security Initiative. FEMA must conduct annual surveys of public entities regarding the grants and provide information on stakeholder feedback and how it was incorporated into these programs.

The Government Accountability Office and FEMA must report to Congress on FEMA’s implementation of the bill.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassPassed380 yea, 45 nayNovember 19, 2025 · Roll call 300

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	37	0	0%
Middle	177	9	5%
Entrenched	207	35	17%
All

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Homeland Security · HouseReported by · Markup by · Discharged from · Referred to
Emergency Management and Technology · HouseReferred to
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · SenateReferred to

Subjects

Government lending and loan guarantees
Intergovernmental relations
State and local finance

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

45Swing 70–100
205Middle 30–70
181Entrenched 0–30
2Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v2, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 13.0 (needs 5.0).

H.R. 4058 · Nov 19, 2025 · Roll call 299On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassEnhancing Stakeholder Support and Outreach for Preparedness Grants Act
PassedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 4367 · Sep 28, 2023 · Roll call 504On PassageMaking appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 28, 2023 · Roll call 460On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 28, 2023 · Roll call 459On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 28, 2023 · Roll call 458On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 28, 2023 · Roll call 457On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 27, 2023 · Roll call 454On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 27, 2023 · Roll call 453On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5

Show 13 more

H.R. 4367 · Sep 27, 2023 · Roll call 452On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 27, 2023 · Roll call 451On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 27, 2023 · Roll call 450On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 4367 · Sep 27, 2023 · Roll call 449On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5

Cosponsors

3 active

Show all 3 cosponsors

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 89 Swing (today: 92)
ContactCall 202-225-6306 Website
2
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today90Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 85 Swing (today: 90)
ContactCall
3
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today89Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 83 Swing (today: 89)
ContactCall
4
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York 17th · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today88Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 83 Swing (today: 88)
ContactCall
5
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today88Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 83 Swing (today: 88)
ContactCall
6
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today88Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 81 Swing (today: 88)
ContactCall
7
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today86Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 80 Swing (today: 86)
ContactCall
8
David G. ValadaoRepublican · California 22nd · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today85Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 78 Swing (today: 85)
ContactCall
9
Thomas R. SuozziDemocrat · New York 3rd · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today84Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 78 Swing (today: 84)
ContactCall
10
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey 5th · Lean D+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Today84Swing
Vote on passage, Nov 19, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 77 Swing (today: 84)
ContactCall