Data: The Downballot · Federal Election Commission · Voteview · Congress.gov · Heritage Action · League of Conservation Voters.Partisan lean is computed by Congress Swing Tracker from presidential results (25% 2020 / 75% 2024); it is not the Cook PVI. Non-voting delegates are not ranked. Scores: model swing-v3. How the score works
H.R. 3838: Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 · Congress Swing Tracker
H.R. 3838·119th Congress·Armed Forces and National Security
Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
This bill sets forth policies and authorities for FY2026 for Department of Defense (DOD) programs and activities, military construction, and the national security programs of the Department of Energy and the Maritime Administration. It also authorizes appropriations for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board and the Naval Petroleum Reserves, and modifies the defense acquisition system to expedite delivery of capabilities to the Armed Forces.
Read full summaryHide full summary
Among other elements, the bill
authorizes the acquisition or modification of various military items (e.g., aircraft) and sets policy for certain procurement programs;
authorizes research, development, test, and evaluation and sets policy for such activities;
sets active component and reserve component end-strength levels;
sets policy regarding various aspects of military health care and military compensation;
sets policy regarding acquisitions and acquisition management, including contracting authorities and small businesses;
sets policy for various matters related to DOD interactions with foreign nations, including matters concerning Israel;
sets policy for various matters related to DOD cyber activities, cyber workforce and training, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence matters; and
authorizes the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration, defense environmental cleanup, nuclear energy, and other defense activities.
How the projections held up
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
House
On PassagePassed231 yea, 196 naySeptember 10, 2025 · Roll call 262
How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote
VotedVoted yea or nay
BrokeBroke with party
Share
Swing
44
6
14%
Middle
216
8
4%
Entrenched
94
0
0%
Insufficient data
Committees and subjects
Committees
House Committee on Armed Services · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Agriculture · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Appropriations · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Financial Services · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on the Budget · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Education and Workforce · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Foreign Affairs · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.
Key players in the House
Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional
: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.
Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.
Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.
Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.
Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.
Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.
For additional information on the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) see
CRS In Focus IF10516, Defense Primer: Navigating the NDAA
, and
CRS In Focus IF10515, Defense Primer: The NDAA Process
.
67
6
9%
All voting members
421
20
5%
: Pair any member who broke with one who stayed with their party: in 79% of those pairs, the one who broke had the higher swing score before the vote. Chance would be 50%.
Projections from swing-v3-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on House Administration · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Homeland Security · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Energy and Commerce · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Natural Resources · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on the Judiciary · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Small Business · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Veterans' Affairs · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
House Committee on Ways and Means · HouseBills of interest - exchange of
Subjects
Accounting and auditing
Advanced technology and technological innovations
Advisory bodies
Alabama
Alaska
Alliances
Animal protection and human-animal relationships
Appropriations
Arab-Israeli relations
Architecture
Arizona
Arkansas
Show all 247 subjects
Armed Forces Retirement Home
Art, artists, authorship
Asia
Assault and harassment offenses
Atmospheric science and weather
Australia
Aviation and airports
Belarus
Belgium
Border security and unlawful immigration
Broadcasting, cable, digital technologies
Building construction
California
Canada
Cancer
Caribbean area
Chemical and biological weapons
Child care and development
Child health
Child safety and welfare
China
Collective security
Competition and antitrust
Computer security and identity theft
Computers and information technology
Conflicts and wars
Congressional officers and employees
Congressional oversight
Connecticut
Correctional facilities and imprisonment
Crimes against children
Criminal procedure and sentencing
Cuba
Data collection, sharing, protection
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Defense spending
Department of Defense
Department of Energy
Diego Garcia
Digital media
Diplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroad
Disability and health-based discrimination
Disability and paralysis
Disability assistance
Disaster relief and insurance
District of Columbia
Domestic violence and child abuse
Drug safety, medical device, and laboratory regulation
Drug trafficking and controlled substances
Drug, alcohol, tobacco use
Education programs funding
Electric power generation and transmission
Elementary and secondary education
Emergency planning and evacuation
Employee hiring
Employee leave
Employee performance
Employment and training programs
Employment discrimination and employee rights
Energy efficiency and conservation
Energy storage, supplies, demand
Environmental assessment, monitoring, research
Europe
Executive agency funding and structure
Family planning and birth control
Family services
Federal officials
Fires
First responders and emergency personnel
Florida
Foreign aid and international relief
Georgia
Germany
Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management
Government information and archives
Government studies and investigations
Government trust funds
Greenland
Guam
Hawaii
Hazardous wastes and toxic substances
Health care costs and insurance
Health care coverage and access
Health facilities and institutions
Health information and medical records
Health personnel
Health programs administration and funding
Health technology, devices, supplies
Higher education
Historic sites and heritage areas
Housing industry and standards
Illinois
Indiana
Industrial facilities
Industrial policy and productivity
Infrastructure development
Insects
Intellectual property
Intelligence activities, surveillance, classified information
International organizations and cooperation
Internet, web applications, social media
Iowa
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Kansas
Kentucky
Labor market
Labor-management relations
Land transfers
Laos
Law enforcement administration and funding
Lawyers and legal services
Libraries and archives
Licensing and registrations
Louisiana
Maine
Manufacturing
Marine and inland water transportation
Maryland
Massachusetts
Materials
Medical tests and diagnostic methods
Members of Congress
Mental health
Metals
Micronesia
Middle East
Military civil functions
Military command and structure
Military education and training
Military facilities and property
Military history
Military law
Military medicine
Military personnel and dependents
Military procurement, research, weapons development
Military readiness
Missing persons
Mississippi
Missouri
Monuments and memorials
Motor vehicles
Museums, exhibitions, cultural centers
National Guard and reserves
Navigation, waterways, harbors
Neurological disorders
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York State
New Zealand
North America
North Carolina
North Korea
Norway
Nuclear power
Nuclear weapons
Nutrition and diet
Oceania
Ohio
Oil and gas
Oklahoma
Oregon
Organized crime
Palau
Pennsylvania
Performance measurement
Personnel records
Poland
Pollution liability
Pornography
Prescription drugs
Public contracts and procurement
Public participation and lobbying
Public-private cooperation
Puerto Rico
Racial and ethnic relations
Radioactive wastes and releases
Religion
Research administration and funding
Research and development
Residential rehabilitation and home repair
Retail and wholesale trades
Russia
Selective Service System
Service animals
Sex and reproductive health
Sex offenses
Small business
Solid waste and recycling
South Carolina
South Dakota
South Korea
Space flight and exploration
Spacecraft and satellites
Spain
Special education
State and local government operations
Strategic materials and reserves
Student records
Supply chain
Syria
Teaching, teachers, curricula
Technology assessment
Technology transfer and commercialization
Telecommunication rates and fees
Tennessee
Terrorism
Texas
Trade secrets and economic espionage
Transportation costs
Transportation employees
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Utah
Veterans' education, employment, rehabilitation
Veterans' medical care
Veterans' organizations and recognition
Vietnam
Violent crime
Virginia
Wages and earnings
Washington State
Water quality
Water resources funding
Water storage
Water use and supply
West Virginia
Women's employment
Women's health
Worker safety and health
Wyoming
Where the House has voted, each member’s appears with the projection made before it.
1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4House Committee on Armed ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 24% of 137 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action, LCV
100Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 10, 2025:YeaBroke with partyProjected: 100 Swing
Similar votesNo dataCommitteeNo committee seatToo few votes on similar bills to measure
—Insufficient data
Ideology vs. swing score, House
Democrat
Republican
Independent
Click any dot to see which member it is. With the keyboard, tab to the chart and use the arrow keys.
Swing score
SWING ZONE 70+Entrenched below 30
Ringed dots broke with their party on the vote.
← More liberalDW-NOMINATE ideology scoreMore conservative →
Ideology is each member’s score. The cluster low on the chart includes the bill’s 2 sponsor and cosponsors in the House: they have already committed, so they score as entrenched. 2 representatives without a DW-NOMINATE score or with insufficient data are not plotted.
Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 143.5 (needs 5.0).
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 261On PassageStreamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
PassedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 258On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 257On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 255On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 254On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 253On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 252On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 251On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
Show 17 more
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 250On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 249On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 248On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 247On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 246On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 245On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 244On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3838 · Sep 10, 2025 · Roll call 243On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toSame bill×3.0
S. 1071 · Dec 10, 2025 · Roll call 319On PassageTo require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 5009 · Dec 11, 2024 · Roll call 1218On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment with an AmendmentWILD Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 8774 · Jun 28, 2024 · Roll call 1049On PassageDepartment of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 8774 · Jun 28, 2024 · Roll call 1047On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 8774 · Jun 28, 2024 · Roll call 1046On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 8774 · Jun 28, 2024 · Roll call 1045On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 8774 · Jun 27, 2024 · Roll call 1044On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 8774 · Jun 27, 2024 · Roll call 1043On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 8774 · Jun 27, 2024 · Roll call 1042On Agreeing to the Amendment
Donald G. DavisDemocrat · North Carolina 1st · Lean R+1House Committee on Armed ServicesOn the ballotIdeology gapScorecard gapCross-pressureSimilar votesCommitteeBroke with party on 36% of 138 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action, LCVToday96SwingVote on passage, Sep 10, 2025:Yea
Jennifer A. KiggansRepublican · Virginia 2nd · Lean EVENHouse Committee on Armed ServicesOn the ballotIdeology gapScorecard gapCross-pressureSimilar votesCommitteeBroke with party on 10% of 137 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: Heritage Action, LCVToday93SwingVote on passage, Sep 10, 2025:Yea
