Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 3692: Captain Accursio “Gus” Sanfilippo Young Fishermen’s Development Act · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 3692119th CongressPublic Lands and Natural Resources

Captain Accursio “Gus” Sanfilippo Young Fishermen’s Development Act

Sponsored by Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA) · 8 active : 6 Republicans, 2 Democrats

Latest action: Received in the Senate.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedMar 3, 2026
Senate: next
President: not yet

8 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

This bill reauthorizes through FY2031 the Young Fishermen’s Development Grant Program, which supports local and regional training, education, outreach, and technical assistance initiatives for young fishermen.

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Natural Resources · HouseReported by · Markup by · Discharged from · Referred to
Water, Wildlife and Fisheries · HouseHearings by (subcommittee) · Referred to

Subjects

Employment and training programs
Marine and coastal resources, fisheries
Vocational and technical education

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the Senate breaks down

8Swing 70–100
78Middle 30–70
14Entrenched 0–30

Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score.

Key players in the Senate

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

1
Susan M. CollinsRepublican · Maine · Lean D+4On the ballot

Similar past votes, Senate

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the Senate: total similarity weight 10.5 (needs 5.0).

H.J.Res. 140 · Apr 16, 2026 · Roll call 743On the Joint ResolutionA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.
Joint Resolution PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 140 · Apr 15, 2026 · Roll call 742On the Motion to ProceedA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.
Motion to Proceed Agreed toSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 130 · Nov 20, 2025 · Roll call 623On the Joint ResolutionA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
Joint Resolution PassedSame policy area×0.5
S.J.Res. 89 · Nov 19, 2025 · Roll call 621On the Motion to ProceedA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
Motion to Proceed Agreed toSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 106 · Oct 9, 2025 · Roll call 560On the Joint ResolutionA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Joint Resolution PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 106 · Oct 9, 2025 · Roll call 559On the Motion to ProceedA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Motion to Proceed Agreed toSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 105 · Oct 8, 2025 · Roll call 556On the Joint ResolutionA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Joint Resolution PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 105 · Oct 8, 2025 · Roll call 553On the Motion to ProceedA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Motion to Proceed Agreed toSame policy area×0.5

Show 13 more

H.J.Res. 104 · Oct 8, 2025 · Roll call 549On the Joint ResolutionA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
Joint Resolution PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 104 · Oct 7, 2025 · Roll call 548On the Motion to ProceedA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
Motion to Proceed Agreed toSame policy area×0.5
H.J.Res. 60 · May 8, 2025 · Roll call 239On the Joint ResolutionA joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to "Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles".
Joint Resolution PassedSame policy area

Cosponsors

8 active

Show all 8 cosponsors

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.