Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 3383: Incentivizing New Ventures and Economic Strength Through Capital Formation Act of 2025 · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 3383119th CongressFinance and Financial Sector

Incentivizing New Ventures and Economic Strength Through Capital Formation Act of 2025

Sponsored by Rep. Ann Wagner (R-MO) · 4 active : 1 Republican, 3 Democrats

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedDec 11, 2025
Senate: next
President: not yet

14 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Increasing Investor Opportunities Act

This bill allows a closed-end fund—a portfolio of pooled assets with a limited number of shares traded on an exchange—to increase its investment in private investment funds. Specifically, the Securities and Exchange Commission is prohibited from limiting the sale or listing of securities of a closed-end fund that invests in private investment funds. This bill also apples to a closed-end company treated as a business development company.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On PassagePassed302 yea, 123 nayDecember 11, 2025 · Roll call 328

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	59	28	47%
Middle	199	51	26%
Entrenched	159	6	4%
Insufficient data

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Financial Services · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · SenateReferred to

Subjects

Banking and financial institutions regulation
Financial services and investments
Securities

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

71Swing 70–100
211Middle 30–70
145Entrenched 0–30
6Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 6 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 35.5 (needs 5.0).

H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 327On PassageIncreasing Investor Opportunities Act
PassedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 326On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 325On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 324On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3357 · Jul 23, 2025 · Roll call 216On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedEnhancing Multi-Class Share Disclosures Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 3633 · Jul 17, 2025 · Roll call 198On PassageCLARITY Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 796On PassageExpanding Access to Capital Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 794On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0

Show 17 more

H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 793On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 792On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 791On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 7, 2024 · Roll call 790On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0

Cosponsors

4 active

Show all 4 cosponsors

David Scott (D-GA-13)
Gregory W. Meeks (D-NY-5)
Pete Sessions (R-TX-17)
Ritchie Torres (D-NY-15)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

All voting members	420	86	20%

1
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York 17th · Lean D+1House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 12% of 37 similar votes
Today99Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 96 Swing (today: 99)
ContactCall 202-225-6506 Website
2
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey 5th · Lean D+2House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 27% of 36 similar votes
Today95Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:YeaBroke with party
3
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 31% of 38 similar votes
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:NayProjected at the vote: 91 Swing (today: 92)
Contact
4
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 11% of 38 similar votes
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 90 Swing (today: 92)
Contact
5
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 23% of 38 similar votes
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:NayProjected at the vote: 93 Swing (today: 92)
Contact
6
Andrew R. GarbarinoRepublican · New York 2nd · Lean R+6House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 4% of 37 similar votes
Today91Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: Swing
6
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 35% of 38 similar votes
Today91Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:YeaBroke with party
8
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa 3rd · Lean R+2House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 3% of 35 similar votes
Today91Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: Swing
9
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 5% of 38 similar votes
Today91Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 89 Swing (today: 91)
Contact
10
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 5% of 37 similar votes
Today89Swing
Vote on passage, Dec 11, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 87 Swing (today: 89)
Contact