Greenlighting Growth Act

Sponsored by Rep. Mike Haridopolos (R-FL) · 1 active : 1 Republican

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedJul 21, 2025
Senate: next
President: not yet

14 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Greenlighting Growth Act

This bill limits the financial information an emerging growth company (EGC) must submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission. An EGC is a type of issuer that qualifies for reduced disclosures after its initial public offering (IPO) if its annual gross revenues are below a specific dollar amount. For example, an EGC must currently provide two years of financial statements after its IPO, rather than the three required for other companies.

Read full summary

Under the bill, an emerging growth company is not required to present certain financial statements from acquired companies. This applies to statements from the time period prior to the earliest audited period presented in connection with the EGC’s IPO. In addition, the bill provides that no issuer that was formerly an EGC is required to present financial statements older than its earliest audit performed in connection with its IPO.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

Passed by voice vote or unanimous consent: no individual votes recorded.

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Financial Services · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · SenateReferred to

Subjects

Accounting and auditing
Administrative law and regulatory procedures
Business records
Government information and archives
Licensing and registrations
Securities
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

71Swing 70–100
215Middle 30–70
141Entrenched 0–30
6Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 6 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 22.5 (needs 5.0).

S. 1582 · Jul 17, 2025 · Roll call 199On PassageGENIUS Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 4790 · Sep 19, 2024 · Roll call 1153On PassageGUARDRAIL Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.J.Res. 109 · Jul 11, 2024 · Roll call 1073Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to “Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121”
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 4763 · May 22, 2024 · Roll call 944On PassageFinancial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 4763 · May 22, 2024 · Roll call 943On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 4763 · May 22, 2024 · Roll call 941On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.J.Res. 109 · May 8, 2024 · Roll call 907On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to “Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121”
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 6955 · Jul 21, 2026 · Roll call 631On PassageMain Street Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5

Show 17 more

H.R. 1181 · Jul 14, 2026 · Roll call 600On PassageProtecting Privacy in Purchases Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 327On PassageIncreasing Investor Opportunities Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 326On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 3383 · Dec 11, 2025 · Roll call 325On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedSame policy area

Cosponsors

1 active

Show all 1 cosponsors

Ann Wagner (R-MO-2)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

1
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York 17th · Lean D+1House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 9% of 37 similar votes
99Swing
ContactCall 202-225-6506 Website
2
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey 5th · Lean D+2House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 28% of 36 similar votes
95Swing
ContactCall
3
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 34% of 38 similar votes
94Swing
ContactCall 202-225-6306 Website
4
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 37% of 38 similar votes
93Swing
ContactCall 202-225-3536 Website
5
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 15% of 38 similar votes
93Swing
ContactCall 202-225-4276 Website
6
Andrew R. GarbarinoRepublican · New York 2nd · Lean R+6House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 6% of 37 similar votes
92Swing
ContactCall
6
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 42% of 38 similar votes
92Swing
ContactCall 202-225-1640 Website
8
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 8% of 38 similar votes
91Swing
ContactCall 202-225-4155 Website
9
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa 3rd · Lean R+2House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 5% of 35 similar votes
91Swing
ContactCall
10
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 7% of 37 similar votes
90Swing
ContactCall 202-225-5361 Website