Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 3062: Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 3062119th CongressEnergy

Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act

Sponsored by Rep. Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) · 2 active : 2 Republicans

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedSep 18, 2025
Senate: next
President: not yet

10 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Promoting Cross-b

order Energy Infrastructure Act

This bill establishes a new process for approving or revoking permits for the construction and operation of energy infrastructure across an international border of the United States. Thus, it replaces the existing process established under specified executive orders.

Read full summary

The bill requires a person to obtain a certificate of crossing before constructing, connecting, operating, or maintaining a border-crossing facility for the import or export of oil or natural gas, or the transmission of electricity, across a U.S. border with Canada or Mexico. A certificate must be obtained from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a facility consisting of oil or natural gas pipelines or the Department of Energy (DOE) for an electric transmission facility. As a condition of issuing a certificate, DOE must require that an electric transmission facility be constructed, connected, operated, or maintained consistent with specified policies and standards.

FERC and DOE must meet a deadline for issuing a certificate as set forth by this bill. The bill also requires FERC to meet a deadline for approving applications to import or export natural gas to or from Canada or Mexico.

The bill also requires the President to obtain the approval of Congress before revoking a permit issued under executive orders for constructing, connecting, operating, or maintaining an oil or natural gas pipeline, an electric transmission facility, or a related border-crossing facility.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On PassagePassed224 yea, 203 naySeptember 18, 2025 · Roll call 277

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	57	6	11%
Middle	253	1	0%
Entrenched	108	0	0%
Insufficient data

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Energy and Commerce · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
House Committee on Natural Resources · HouseDischarged from · Referred to
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · HouseDischarged from · Referred to
Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials · HouseReferred to
Energy · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · SenateReferred to

Subjects

Administrative law and regulatory procedures
Canada
Department of Energy

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

75Swing 70–100
231Middle 30–70
124Entrenched 0–30
3Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 3 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 72.0 (needs 5.0).

H.R. 3062 · Sep 18, 2025 · Roll call 276On PassagePromoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act
PassedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3668 · Dec 12, 2025 · Roll call 333On PassageImproving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1949 · Nov 20, 2025 · Roll call 303On PassageUnlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.J.Res. 20 · Feb 27, 2025 · Roll call 52On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to “Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters”
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 7176 · Feb 15, 2024 · Roll call 770On PassageUnlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1640 · Jun 14, 2023 · Roll call 267On PassageSave Our Gas Stoves Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1640 · Jun 14, 2023 · Roll call 266On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1640 · Jun 14, 2023 · Roll call 265On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0

Show 17 more

H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 181On PassageLower Energy Costs Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 179On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 178On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1 · Mar 30, 2023 · Roll call 177On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0

Cosponsors

2 active

Show all 2 cosponsors

Neal P. Dunn (R-FL-2)
John Joyce (R-PA-13)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

All voting members	421	7	2%

1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 49% of 114 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
100Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:NayProjected: 100 Swing
ContactCall 202-225-6306 Website
2
Jennifer A. KiggansRepublican · Virginia 2nd · Lean EVENHouse Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 6% of 116 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
97Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:YeaProjected: Swing
3
Adam GrayDemocrat · California 13th · Lean R+1House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 60% of 23 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today96Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:Not voting
4
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENHouse Committee on Energy and CommerceOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 4% of 114 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today96Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:Yea
5
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York 4th · Lean D+2House Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 22% of 24 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today95Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:Nay
6
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 36% of 117 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:YeaProjected: 93 Swing
Contact
7
Robert P. BresnahanRepublican · Pennsylvania 8th · Lean R+4House Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 3% of 26 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:Yea
8
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 46% of 117 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:NayProjected at the vote: 93 Swing (today: 92)
9
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire 1st · Lean D+2House Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 16% of 117 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:Nay
10
Kevin KileyIndependent · California 3rd · Lean R+2House Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 2% of 114 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 18, 2025:Yea