Loading bill breakdown…
H.R. 2004119th CongressHealth
Tyler’s Law
Sponsored by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) · 65 active : 30 Republicans, 35 Democrats
Latest action: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 625.
Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate9 senators score as swing votes
Passed House
- House: passedSep 15, 2026
- Senate: next
- President: not yet
Summary
, via Congress.govTyler’s Law
This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to complete, within one year after the bill’s enactment, a study on how frequently Medicare-participating hospital emergency departments test for fentanyl in patients experiencing an overdose, the costs associated with such testing, and how such testing may impact patients.
Read full summaryHide full summary
Within six months after the study’s completion and based on its results, HHS must issue guidance regarding (1) whether hospital emergency departments should implement fentanyl testing as a routine procedure for patients experiencing an overdose, (2) how to ensure clinicians know which substances they are testing for in routine drug tests, and (3) how fentanyl testing may affect the future risk of overdose and other health outcomes.
Committees and subjects
Committees
- House Committee on Energy and Commerce · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
- Health · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
Subjects
- Drug, alcohol, tobacco use
- Emergency medical services and trauma care
- Government information and archives
- Government studies and investigations
- Hospital care
- Medical tests and diagnostic methods
Model
Directional: count only breaks toward the other partyWhy do scores change?v3default (selected)v2 model swing-v2
How the Senate breaks down
- 9Swing 70–100
- 62Middle 30–70
- 29Entrenched 0–30
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score.
Key players in the Senate
Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Similar past votes, Senate
Earlier behind swing-v3’s inputLoading similar votes
Cosponsors
65 activeShow all 65 cosponsors
- Dan Crenshaw (R-TX-2)
- David G. Valadao (R-CA-22)
- Debbie Dingell (D-MI-6)
- Dina Titus (D-NV-1)
- Don Bacon (R-NE-2)
- Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC-AL)
- Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ-6)
- Marc A. Veasey (D-TX-33)
- Michael Lawler (R-NY-17)
- Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-CA-44)
- Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL-8)
- Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ-7)
- Robert E. Latta (R-OH-5)
- Sarah McBride (D-DE-AL)
- Scott H. Peters (D-CA-50)
- Sharice Davids (D-KS-3)
- Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL-20)
- Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA-37)
- Troy Balderson (R-OH-12)
How the swing score works
Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.
Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.
Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.
Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.
Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.
Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.
