Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 1329: Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 1329119th CongressArts, Culture, Religion

Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act

Sponsored by Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) · 231 active : 104 Republicans, 127 Democrats

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Read the summary

Where it standsBefore the House

Hasn’t passed either chamber

House: next
Senate: not yet
President: not yet

15 representatives score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act

This bill authorizes the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum to be located on a particular site within the Reserve of the National Mall in Washington, DC.

Read full summary

Specifically, the bill designates the South Monument site as the location for the museum; however, the President may designate an alternative site within 180 days of the bill's enactment. (The site is the undeveloped land across the National Mall from the National Museum of African American History and Culture.) Administrative jurisdiction of the site must be transferred to the Smithsonian Institution.

The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution must have the approval of specified federal entities (e.g., the Commission of Fine Arts) to plan, design, and construct a museum building. The bill (1) outlines the criteria for considering site and design proposals, and (2) requires the Smithsonian Institution to reimburse for costs resulting from the building approval process.

The bill directs the museum to be dedicated to preserving, researching, and presenting the history, achievements, and lived experiences of biological women in the United States. Under this bill, the museum may not identify, present, describe, or depict any biological male as a female.

In carrying out its duties, the museum's advisory council must (1) seek and utilize guidance from a broad array of knowledgeable and respected sources reflecting the diversity of the political viewpoints and authentic experiences held by women in the United States, and (2) seek guidance for the creation and substantial revision of exhibits and programs.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On PassageFailed204 yea, 216 nayMay 21, 2026 · Roll call 188

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	19	0	0%
Middle	100	3	3%
Entrenched	301	3	1%
All

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on House Administration · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to
House Committee on Natural Resources · HouseDischarged from · Referred to
Federal Lands · HouseHearings by (subcommittee) · Referred to

Subjects

Congressional oversight
Government buildings, facilities, and property
Museums, exhibitions, cultural centers
Smithsonian Institution
U.S. history

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

15Swing 70–100
96Middle 30–70
320Entrenched 0–30
2Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Not applicable in the House. There is not enough similar voting history (weight 3.5 of 5.0 needed), so this input is left out of the score rather than counted as missing.

H.R. 1329 · May 21, 2026 · Roll call 548On PassageSmithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act
FailedSame bill×3.0
H.R. 3250 · Apr 10, 2024 · Roll call 827On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassNational Museum of Play Recognition Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5

Cosponsors

231 active · 1 withdrawn

Show all 232 cosponsors

Adriano Espaillat (D-NY-13)
Andrea Salinas (D-OR-6)
Andy Barr (R-KY-6)
August Pfluger (R-TX-11)
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen (R-AS-AL)
Brian J. Mast (R-FL-21)
Brian K. Fitzpatrick (R-PA-1)
Burgess Owens (R-UT-4)
Carlos A. Gimenez (R-FL-28)
Carol D. Miller (R-WV-1)
Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann (R-TN-3)
Chellie Pingree (D-ME-1)
Claudia Tenney (R-NY-24)
Cliff Bentz (R-OR-2)
Dan Newhouse (R-WA-4)
Daniel Meuser (R-PA-9)
Danny K. Davis (D-IL-7)
Darrell Issa (R-CA-48)
David Rouzer (R-NC-7)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4House Committee on Natural ResourcesFederal LandsOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommittee
100Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:NayProjected: 100 Swing
ContactCall 202-225-6306 Website
2
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommitteeNo committee seat
Today90Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:NayProjected at the vote: 91 Swing (today: 90)
ContactCall
3
Adam GrayDemocrat · California 13th · Lean R+1House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommittee
Today90Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:NayProjected at the vote: 92 Swing (today: 90)
4
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado 3rd · Lean R+5House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommittee
Today84Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:YeaProjected at the vote: 81 Swing (today: 84)
5
Donald G. DavisDemocrat · North Carolina 1st · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommitteeNo committee seat
84Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:NayProjected: 84 Swing
ContactCall
6
Kevin KileyIndependent · California 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommitteeNo committee seat
Today83Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:YeaProjected at the vote: 64 Middle (today: 83)
ContactCall
7
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire 2nd · Lean D+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommitteeNo committee seat
Today80Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:NayProjected at the vote: 72 Swing (today: 80)
ContactCall
8
Andrew R. GarbarinoRepublican · New York 2nd · Lean R+6On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommitteeNo committee seat
Today80Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:YeaProjected at the vote: 79 Swing (today: 80)
ContactCall
9
Jim CostaDemocrat · California 21st · Lean D+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommitteeNo committee seat
Today76Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:NayProjected at the vote: 82 Swing (today: 76)
ContactCall
10
David P. JoyceRepublican · Ohio 14th · Lean R+9On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votesNot applicableCommitteeNo committee seat
Today76Swing
Vote on passage, May 21, 2026:YeaProjected at the vote: 74 Swing (today: 76)
ContactCall