Loading bill breakdown…
H.R. 909119th CongressCrime and Law Enforcement
Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025
Sponsored by Rep. Ann Wagner (R-MO) · 327 active : 153 Republicans, 174 Democrats
Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate10 senators score as swing votes
Passed House
- House: passedJan 12, 2026
- Senate: next
- President: not yet
Summary
, via Congress.govCrime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025
This bill adds a new source of revenue for the Crime Victims Fund (CVF). Specifically, the bill requires certain civil monetary penalties collected from settlements and judgments in cases involving fraud and false claims against the federal government to be deposited into the CVF through FY2029.
Read full summaryHide full summary
The CVF supports federal, state, and local programs and activities to compensate and assist victims of crimes. Currently, the CVF is funded by deposits from a variety of sources, including federal criminal fines, penalties, and assessments; forfeited bail bonds; and certain other gifts, donations, and bequests.
How the projections held up
Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.
House
Passed by voice vote or unanimous consent: no individual votes recorded.
Committees and subjects
Committees
- House Committee on the Judiciary · HouseReferred to
- Senate Committee on the Judiciary · SenateReferred to
Subjects
- Crime victims
- Government trust funds
Model
Directional: count only breaks toward the other partyWhy do scores change?v3default (selected)v2 model swing-v2
How the Senate breaks down
- 10Swing 70–100
- 65Middle 30–70
- 25Entrenched 0–30
Members fall into . All 100 senators have enough data to score.
Key players in the Senate
Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.
Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.
Similar past votes, Senate
Earlier behind swing-v3’s inputLoading similar votes
Cosponsors
327 activeShow all 327 cosponsors
- Debbie Dingell (D-MI-6)
- Derek Schmidt (R-KS-2)
- Jim Costa (D-CA-21)
- Nathaniel Moran (R-TX-1)
- Stephanie I. Bice (R-OK-5)
- Brian K. Fitzpatrick (R-PA-1)
- Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann (R-TN-3)
- Clay Higgins (R-LA-3)
- Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO-5)
- Frank J. Mrvan (D-IN-1)
- James R. Baird (R-IN-4)
- Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ-6)
- Lauren Boebert (R-CO-4)
- Mark E. Amodei (R-NV-2)
- Nancy Mace (R-SC-1)
- Pat Fallon (R-TX-4)
- Tim Burchett (R-TN-2)
- Blake D. Moore (R-UT-1)
- Burgess Owens (R-UT-4)
- Claudia Tenney
How the swing score works
Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.
Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.
Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.
Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.
Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.
Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.
