Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 3766: To prohibit the District of Columbia from requiring tribunals in court or administrative proceedings in the District of Columbia to defer to the Mayor of the District of Columbia's interpretation of statutes and regulations, and for other purposes. · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 3766119th CongressLaw

To prohibit the District of Columbia from requiring tribunals in court or administrative proceedings in the District of Columbia to defer to the Mayor of the District of Columbia's interpretation of statutes and regulations, and for other purposes.

Sponsored by Rep. Harriet M. Hageman (R-WY) · 1 active : 1 Republican

Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 565.

Read the summary

Where it standsBefore the House

Hasn’t passed either chamber

House: next
Senate: not yet
President: not yet

36 representatives score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of this bill yet.

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · HouseReported by · Markup by · Referred to

Subjects

District of Columbia
Judicial review and appeals

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

36Swing 70–100
254Middle 30–70
141Entrenched 0–30
2Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Not applicable in the House. There is not enough similar voting history (weight 3.0 of 5.0 needed), so this input is left out of the score rather than counted as missing.

H.J.Res. 1 · Sep 2, 2026 · Roll call 653On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassProposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices
FailedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 8365 · May 14, 2026 · Roll call 533On PassageMonitor Accountability Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 5125 · Sep 17, 2025 · Roll call 273On PassageDistrict of Columbia Judicial Nominations Reform Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 1526 · Apr 9, 2025 · Roll call 97On PassageNo Rogue Rulings Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
S. 4199 · Dec 12, 2024 · Roll call 1219On PassageJUDGES Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 788 · Jan 11, 2024 · Roll call 725On PassageStop Settlement Slush Funds Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5

Cosponsors

1 active

Show all 1 cosponsors

Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI-5)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.