Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 747: Stop Chinese Fentanyl Act of 2025 · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 747119th CongressInternational Affairs

Stop Chinese Fentanyl Act of 2025

Sponsored by Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY) · 9 active : 7 Republicans, 2 Democrats

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedSep 2, 2025
Senate: next
President: not yet

10 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Stop Chinese Fentanyl Act of 2025

This bill subjects certain Chinese entities and government officials to potential sanctions related to opioid trafficking and requires the President to conduct certain preliminary analyses before regulating economic transactions in the event of a national emergency related to international drug trafficking.

Read full summary

Specifically, for the purposes of the Fentanyl Sanctions Act, the bill changes the definition of foreign opioid trafficker to specify that the term includes (1) Chinese entities involved in the production or sale of synthetic opioids or related pharmaceutical ingredients that fail to take steps to detect or prevent opioid trafficking; and (2) certain senior Chinese government officials that aid and abet opioid trafficking, including through intentional inaction. Under current law, the President must impose certain sanctions on individuals and entities identified as foreign opioid traffickers.

Further, the bill extends through 2029 an existing requirement that the President report to Congress annually on identified foreign opioid traffickers and any sanctions imposed on them. (This requirement expired in December 2024.)

The bill also requires the President to take additional steps in issuing regulations under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) pursuant to a declared national emergency related to international drug trafficking. (IEEPA authorizes the President to regulate a variety of economic transactions following a declaration of national emergency.) Under the bill, the President must evaluate the costs and benefits of issuing economic regulations for the purpose of resolving the drug trafficking emergency and publish a discussion of such costs and benefits.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedPassed407 yea, 4 naySeptember 2, 2025 · Roll call 220

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	60	0	0%
Middle	194	3	2%
Entrenched	144	1	1%

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Financial Services · HouseBills of interest - exchange of · Reported by · Markup by · Referred to
House Committee on Foreign Affairs · HouseMarkup by · Referred to
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · HouseBills of interest - exchange of · Referred to
House Committee on the Judiciary · HouseBills of interest - exchange of · Referred to
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · SenateReferred to

Subjects

Asia
China
Civil actions and liability
Congressional oversight
Drug trafficking and controlled substances
Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

70Swing 70–100
231Middle 30–70
130Entrenched 0–30
2Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 2 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 51.0 (needs 5.0).

H.R. 36 · May 5, 2025 · Roll call 115On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassMEGOBARI Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1425 · Sep 11, 2024 · Roll call 1129On PassageNo WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 1157 · Sep 9, 2024 · Roll call 1119On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassCountering the PRC Malign Influence Fund Authorization Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 6323 · Apr 17, 2024 · Roll call 858On PassageIran Counterterrorism Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 5961 · Nov 30, 2023 · Roll call 682On PassageNo Funds for Iranian Terrorism Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 5961 · Nov 30, 2023 · Roll call 681On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 5961 · Nov 30, 2023 · Roll call 680On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 5961 · Nov 30, 2023 · Roll call 679On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0

Show 17 more

H.R. 5961 · Nov 30, 2023 · Roll call 678On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 5961 · Nov 30, 2023 · Roll call 677On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 3774 · Nov 3, 2023 · Roll call 593On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedSHIP Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 5334 · Sep 16, 2026 · Roll call 668On Motion to Concur in the Senate AmendmentsAn Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes
PassedSame policy area

Cosponsors

9 active

Show all 9 cosponsors

Gregory F. Murphy (R-NC-3)
Zachary Nunn (R-IA-3)
Michael Lawler (R-NY-17)
Tim Moore (R-NC-14)
Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL-13)
Young Kim (R-CA-40)
Robert P. Bresnahan (R-PA-8)
Chris Pappas (D-NH-1)
Laura Gillen (D-NY-4)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

All voting members	406	4	1%

1
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENHouse Committee on Foreign AffairsOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 23% of 85 similar votes
Today97Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 95 Swing (today: 97)
ContactCall 202-225-5361 Website
2
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey 5th · Lean D+2House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 21% of 85 similar votes
Today95Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: Swing
3
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 28% of 90 similar votes
Today95Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 93 Swing (today: 95)
Contact
4
Kevin KileyIndependent · California 3rd · Lean R+2House Committee on the JudiciaryOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 22% of 91 similar votes
Today94Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 93 Swing
5
Michael R. TurnerRepublican · Ohio 10th · Lean R+3House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 23% of 91 similar votes
Today93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: Swing
6
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 25% of 91 similar votes
Today93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 91 Swing (today: 93)
Contact
7
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 33% of 91 similar votes
Today93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 90 Swing (today: 93)
Contact
8
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida 23rd · Lean D+2House Committee on Foreign AffairsHouse Committee on the JudiciaryOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 17% of 89 similar votes
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:Yea
9
Andrew R. GarbarinoRepublican · New York 2nd · Lean R+6House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 20% of 84 similar votes
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: Swing
10
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 23% of 90 similar votes
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 2, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 88 Swing (today: 92)
Contact