Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.R. 736: Protect Small Businesses from Excessive Paperwork Act of 2025 · Congress Swing Tracker

H.R. 736119th CongressFinance and Financial Sector

Protect Small Businesses from Excessive Paperwork Act of 2025

Sponsored by Rep. Zachary Nunn (R-IA) · 12 active : 10 Republicans, 2 Democrats

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Read the summary

Where it standsPassed House, now in the Senate

Passed House

House: passedFeb 10, 2025
Senate: next
President: not yet

14 senators score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

Protect Small Businesses from Excessive Paperwork Act of 2025

This bill extends the deadline for certain companies that are required to file beneficial ownership information with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Specifically, the bill requires companies formed or registered before January 1, 2024, to submit this information to FinCEN by January 1, 2026, instead of by January 1, 2025, as required under current regulations.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassPassed408 yea, 0 nayFebruary 10, 2025 · Roll call 37

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	Share
Swing	39	0%
Middle	161	0%
Entrenched	136	0%

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Financial Services · HouseReferred to
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · SenateReferred to

Subjects

Business records
Corporate finance and management
Licensing and registrations
Small business

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

69Swing 70–100
207Middle 30–70
151Entrenched 0–30
6Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 6 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted. The bill is not before the House right now; these scores show where members would stand.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 24.0 (needs 5.0).

H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 796On PassageExpanding Access to Capital Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 794On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 793On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 792On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 8, 2024 · Roll call 791On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 7, 2024 · Roll call 790On Agreeing to the Amendment
FailedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 7, 2024 · Roll call 789On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 7, 2024 · Roll call 788On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0

Show 17 more

H.R. 2799 · Mar 7, 2024 · Roll call 787On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 2799 · Mar 7, 2024 · Roll call 786On Agreeing to the Amendment
Agreed toShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 6955 · Jul 21, 2026 · Roll call 631On PassageMain Street Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 1181 · Jul 14, 2026 · Roll call 600On PassageProtecting Privacy in Purchases Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5

Cosponsors

12 active

Show all 12 cosponsors

Donald G. Davis (D-NC-1)
Sharice Davids (D-KS-3)
Tom Emmer (R-MN-6)
Bill Huizenga (R-MI-4)
Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL-27)
Andy Barr (R-KY-6)
Marlin A. Stutzman (R-IN-3)
Monica De La Cruz (R-TX-15)
Michelle Fischbach (R-MN-7)
Bryan Steil (R-WI-1)
Daniel Meuser (R-PA-9)
Troy Downing (R-MT-2)

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

All voting members	401	0	0%

1
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York 17th · Lean D+1House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 9% of 37 similar votes
Today99Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 96 Swing (today: 99)
ContactCall 202-225-6506 Website
2
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey 5th · Lean D+2House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 27% of 36 similar votes
Today95Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:Not votingProjected at the vote: Swing
3
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 30% of 38 similar votes
Today94Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 93 Swing (today: 94)
Contact
4
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 40% of 38 similar votes
Today93Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 91 Swing (today: 93)
Contact
5
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 14% of 38 similar votes
Today93Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 90 Swing (today: 93)
Contact
6
Andrew R. GarbarinoRepublican · New York 2nd · Lean R+6House Committee on Financial ServicesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 6% of 37 similar votes
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: Swing
7
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 38% of 38 similar votes
Today91Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 89 Swing (today: 91)
Contact
8
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 7% of 38 similar votes
Today91Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 90 Swing (today: 91)
Contact
9
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 7% of 37 similar votes
Today90Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 87 Swing (today: 90)
Contact
10
David G. ValadaoRepublican · California 22nd · Lean R+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 8% of 28 similar votes
Today89Swing
Vote on passage, Feb 10, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 87 Swing (today: 89)
Contact