Congress Swing TrackerLegislative intelligence Swing vote analysis

H.J.Res. 105: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan". · Congress Swing Tracker

H.J.Res. 105119th CongressPublic Lands and Natural Resources

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".

Sponsored by Rep. Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) · 0 active

Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-49.

Read the summary

Where it standsBecame law

Became law

House: passedSep 3, 2025
Senate: passedOct 8, 2025
President: Signed into lawDec 11, 2025

71 representatives score as swing votes

Summary

, via Congress.gov

Summary on Congress.gov

This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) relating to the Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan (RMP) for the North Dakota Field Office and issued on January 8, 2025.

By way of background, an RMP guides the management of lands administered by BLM. The 2025 North Dakota RMP modified the 1988 RMP, including by limiting development of oil and gas in low-potential areas and new coal leasing to areas within four miles of existing mines.

How the projections held up

Each member’s recorded vote compared with their swing projection from before the vote. A member by voting against most of their own party.

House

On PassagePassed215 yea, 211 naySeptember 3, 2025 · Roll call 226

How members in each band voted on this House vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	BrokeBroke with party	Share
Swing	56	1	2%
Middle	242	0	0%
Entrenched	122	0	0%
All

Committees and subjects

Committees

House Committee on Natural Resources · HouseReferred to

Subjects

Administrative law and regulatory procedures
Department of the Interior
Land use and conservation
Mining
North Dakota

Senate · 100 House · 433

Model

v3defaultv2

Directional: count only breaks toward the other party Why do scores change?

How the House breaks down

71Swing 70–100
203Middle 30–70
154Entrenched 0–30
5Insufficient data not ranked

Members fall into . 5 representatives don’t have enough data yet and are marked “insufficient data”. Non-voting delegates are not counted.

Key players in the House

Ranked by swing score, 0–100 · swing-v3, directional

: only movement toward the other party counts, so members who sit further from the center than their party no longer score as swing votes.

Bars show each input from 0 to 100: ideology gap, scorecard gap, , and the . is the seat’s partisan lean, and shows how much of the input data a score has.

Similar past votes, House

Earlier behind swing-v3’s input

Similar votes count toward swing-v3 in the House: total similarity weight 20.0 (needs 5.0).

H.J.Res. 105 · Sep 3, 2025 · Roll call 225On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan”
PassedSame bill×3.0
H.J.Res. 140 · Jan 21, 2026 · Roll call 398On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.J.Res. 130 · Nov 18, 2025 · Roll call 293On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment”
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.J.Res. 106 · Sep 3, 2025 · Roll call 224On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan”
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.J.Res. 104 · Sep 3, 2025 · Roll call 223On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment”
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.J.Res. 60 · Apr 29, 2025 · Roll call 109On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to “Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles”
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 3195 · Apr 30, 2024 · Roll call 889On PassageSuperior National Forest Restoration Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 3397 · Apr 30, 2024 · Roll call 883On PassageWEST Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0

Show 17 more

H.R. 6009 · Mar 20, 2024 · Roll call 813On PassageRestoring American Energy Dominance Act
PassedShared subjects×1.0
S.J.Res. 9 · Jul 27, 2023 · Roll call 380On PassageProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, U.S. Code, relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Sec. 4(d) Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Population Segment”
PassedShared subjects×1.0
H.R. 4219 · Sep 14, 2026 · Roll call 656On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedNational Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species Strike Team Act
PassedSame policy area×0.5
H.R. 5103 · Mar 25, 2026 · Roll call 461

Cosponsors

0 active

This bill has no cosponsors.

How the swing score works

Ideology gapHow far a member’s DW-NOMINATE voting score sits from their party’s median in the same chamber.

Scorecard gapHow far their Heritage Action and LCV ratings stray from their party’s average, using the groups’ votes on similar bills where available.

Cross-pressureHow strongly their district or state leans toward the other party, from our own computed partisan lean.

Similar votesHow often they voted against their own party on earlier roll calls about this bill or similar ones.

Committee bonusMembers of the committees handling the bill decide whether it moves, so they get a boost.

Cosponsor checkThe sponsor and active cosponsors have already committed, so they drop toward entrenched.

Senate

On the Joint ResolutionPassed50 yea, 45 nayOctober 8, 2025 · Roll call 556

How members in each band voted on this Senate vote, by their projection before the vote
BandBand before the vote	VotedVoted yea or nay	Share
Swing	7	0%
Middle	64	0%
Entrenched	22	0%
All voting members	93	0%

Too few members broke with their party to measure .

Projections from swing-v3-dir, computed with data from before the vote. Present and not voting never count as breaking.

1
Jared F. GoldenDemocrat · Maine 2nd · Lean R+4House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 32% of 25 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
100Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:NayProjected: 100 Swing
ContactCall 202-225-6306 Website
2
Adam GrayDemocrat · California 13th · Lean R+1House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 26% of 16 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today94Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:Nay
3
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada 3rd · Lean D+1House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 8% of 26 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today94Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:Nay
4
Marie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocrat · Washington 3rd · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 31% of 25 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:NayProjected: 93 Swing
ContactCall
5
Brian K. FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania 1st · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 48% of 26 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
93Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:NayBroke with party
6
Jennifer A. KiggansRepublican · Virginia 2nd · Lean EVENHouse Committee on Natural ResourcesOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
Committee
Broke with party on 7% of 26 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:Yea
7
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York 17th · Lean D+1On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 10% of 26 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 80 Swing (today: 92)
8
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska 2nd · Lean D+3On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 12% of 25 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today92Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 80 Swing (today: 92)
9
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas 28th · Lean R+2On the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 31% of 25 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
91Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:NayProjected: 91 Swing
ContactCall
10
Thomas H. KeanRepublican · New Jersey 7th · Lean EVENOn the ballot
Ideology gap
Scorecard gap
Cross-pressure
Similar votes
CommitteeNo committee seatBroke with party on 10% of 23 similar votesTopic-matched scorecard: LCV
Today90Swing
Vote on passage, Sep 3, 2025:YeaProjected at the vote: 79 Swing (today: 90)